When Local Trade-Offs between SDGs Turn Out to Be Wealth-Dependent: Interaction between Expanding Rice Cultivation and Eradicating Malaria in Rwanda
Alexis Rulisa (),
Luuk van Kempen () and
Dirk-Jan Koch ()
Additional contact information
Alexis Rulisa: Department of Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, and Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Luuk van Kempen: Department of Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, and Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Dirk-Jan Koch: Department of Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, and Radboud Social Cultural Research, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 4, 1-24
Interactions between SDGs are increasingly mapped and mediating factors that determine whether existing synergies or trade-offs can be identified. However, if and how the wealth status of the concerned population shapes whether SDG interaction constitutes a vicious or virtuous circle is largely overlooked. This article focuses on interaction between SDG2 (nutrition) and SDG3 (health), in particular, the relationship between rice production intensification and the fight against malaria, and thus the role of wealth in explaining the trade-off. This study employed a large-scale survey of rural households ( n = 3968) in eastern Rwanda, conducted at a time when a rapid expansion of rice fields co-existed with a strong resurgence of malaria. Logistic regression shows that rice-cultivating households faced significant higher malaria risk, as proxied by fever incidence, confirming the negative externality of agricultural intensification on public health through offering a habitat for vector-borne diseases. Even though rice-cultivating households tend to be higher up the local wealth distribution than those outside the rice sector, its distributional effects are generally biased against the poor. Poorer households outside the rice sector hardly share in the benefits from increased rice production but suffer the consequences in terms of increased malaria risk. The case thus draws attention to the importance of using a distributional lens when analyzing interaction between SDGs locally.
Keywords: SDGs; trade-off; malaria; rice cultivation; paddy paradox; nutrition; Rwanda (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2100-:d:747830
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Hayley Chen
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().