Challenges to the Circular Economy: Recovering Wastes from Simple versus Complex Products

Carly Jacobs, Katie Soulliere, Susan Sawyer-Beaulieu, Abir Sabzwari and Edwin Tam
Additional contact information
Carly Jacobs: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
Katie Soulliere: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
Susan Sawyer-Beaulieu: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
Abir Sabzwari: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
Edwin Tam: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 5, 1-17

Abstract: The circular economy re-interprets the recovery of materials by promoting designing out waste from products, retaining materials for reuse, and emphasizing key elements universally accepted for sustainability. The current efforts to target, isolate, and reduce single-use items, particularly plastics, have only recently begun in earnest. Unfortunately, the recovery and recycling of materials have been disrupted by global market uncertainty, and recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic and its impacts complicate materials recovery, the core of the circular economy still depends on efficiently capturing and returning spent materials for production. Arguably, our perception and common understanding of the recovery process is influenced significantly by the recycling of simple consumer products, such as plastic bags and beverage bottles. However, there are greater difficulties when managing multiple materials from significantly more complex consumer products, for example, from end-of-life vehicles. This paper presents an overview of how waste recovery-related issues vary between simple versus complex consumer products. Using food packaging, tires, cell phones, furniture, and end-of-life vehicles as examples, this paper provides a commentary on the challenges facing complex product recovery compared to simple consumer products in the Canadian context in order to establish how this classification concept can be beneficial for describing a given product and its materials recovery prospects. A categorization framework is developed and applied to these case study products to provide a relative comparison of product complexity.

Keywords: circular economy; material recovery; recycling; simple goods; complex goods; durable goods; repair; refurbish (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2576/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2576/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2576-:d:757028

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().