The Environmental Sustainability of Digital Technologies: Stakeholder Practices and Perspectives

Gabrielle Samuel, Federica Lucivero and Lucas Somavilla
Additional contact information
Gabrielle Samuel: Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King’s College London, Bush House, Strand, London WC2B 4BG, UK
Federica Lucivero: Ethox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Lucas Somavilla: Responsible Technology Institute, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LN, UK

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence and associated digital technologies (DTs) have environmental impacts. These include heavy carbon dioxide emissions linked to the energy consumption required to generate and process large amounts of data; extracting minerals for, and manufacturing of, technological components; and e-waste. These environmental impacts are receiving increasing policy and media attention through discourses of environmental sustainability. At the same time, ‘sustainability’ is a complex and nebulous term with a multiplicity of meanings and practices. This paper explores how experts working with DTs understand and utilise the concept of environmental sustainability in their practices. Our research question was how do stakeholders researching, governing or working on the environmental impacts of DTs, utilise environmental sustainability concepts? We applied a combination of bibliometric analysis and 24 interviews with key stakeholders from the digital technology sector. Findings show that, although stakeholders have broad conceptual understandings of the term sustainability and its relation to the environmental impacts of DTs, in practice, environmental sustainability tends to be associated with technology based and carboncentric approaches. While narrowing conceptual understandings of environmental sustainability was viewed to have a practical purpose, it hid broader sustainability concerns. We urge those in the field not to lose sight of the wider ‘ethos of sustainability’.

Keywords: sustainability; artificial intelligence; digital technologies; qualitative research; environmental impact; sustainable development; carboncentric; technocentric (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3791/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3791/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3791-:d:777894

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().