Do Environmental Administrative Penalties Affect Audit Fees? Results from Multiple Econometric Models

Chunhua Xin, Xiaolu Hao and Lu Cheng
Additional contact information
Chunhua Xin: School of Management, China University Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Xiaolu Hao: School of Management, China University Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China
Lu Cheng: School of Management, China University Mining & Technology, Beijing 100083, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 7, 1-25

Abstract: The construction of ecological civilization is an important requirement to realize high-quality development of the economy. Over recent decades, natural disasters, global warming, and other ecological problems have occurred frequently, and countries around the world are facing severe environmental challenges. Sustainable development is an effective way to solve these environmental threats, and environmental administrative penalties play a fundamental role in sustainable growth. So, we explore the response of external stakeholders to environmental administrative penalties from the perspective of auditors. The study examines whether environmental administrative penalties affect audit fees, the heterogeneity effects and the mechanisms. The research uses data of heavily polluting listed firms in China that have been revealed by the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE). The findings show the following: (1) environmental administrative penalties can increase audit fees; (2) the effective internal control environment can weaken the positive relationship between firms’ environmental administrative penalties and audit fees, and the stronger regional environmental regulation can enhance the positive impact of firms’ environmental administrative penalties on audit fees; (3) further analysis shows that the impact of environmental administrative penalties on audit fees mainly comes from the “risk premium mechanism” rather than the “cost compensation mechanism”, and the response from audit fees can encourage firms to engage in green innovation activities. The above research conclusions provide a certain reference for auditors’ pricing decisions.

Keywords: sustainable development; environmental administrative penalties; audit fees; risk premium mechanism; cost compensation mechanism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4268/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4268/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4268-:d:786619

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().