Barriers to Using ESG Data for Investment Decisions

Bjorg Jonsdottir, Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, Lara Johannsdottir and Stefan Wendt
Additional contact information
Bjorg Jonsdottir: Faculty of Business Administration, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson: Faculty of Business Administration, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Lara Johannsdottir: Faculty of Business Administration, University of Iceland, Saemundargata 2, 102 Reykjavik, Iceland
Stefan Wendt: Department of Business, Bifrost University, 311 Borgarnes, Iceland

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-14

Abstract: Institutional investors who commit to integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) aspects into investment decisions require ESG data of sufficient quality. However, concerns have risen over a lack of quality in ESG data, as outlined by the Global Reporting Initiative. The lack of quality in ESG data deters institutional investors from using the data for investment decisions. This study outlines the ESG data reporting process and explores where in the process quality concerns emerge. Semi-structured interviews are applied with professionals involved in ESG data analysis and reporting of listed companies, a rating agency and institutional investors. The results show that current barriers to using ESG data include a lack of materiality, accuracy and reliability. Interviewees agree that access to data collected by governmental institutions is lacking, and that companies’ purchase of carbon credits raise questions about the reliability of ESG data. Companies hold contrasting views to the institutional investors on the useability of the data they disclose. The results enhance our understanding of the common and contrasting concerns about the lack of quality in ESG data. The results can be used as guide for companies, investors and regulators for actions to mitigate barriers related to the lack of quality in ESG reporting.

Keywords: ESG; data quality; reporting; investment decisions; integration barrier (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5157/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5157/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5157-:d:801493

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().