EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Aboriginal Community Co-Design and Co-Build—Far More than a House

Kristian Rodd, Jara Romero, Victor Hunter and Scott Vladimir Martyn
Additional contact information
Kristian Rodd: Foundation for Indigenous Sustainable Health, Perth 6850, Australia
Jara Romero: Foundation for Indigenous Sustainable Health, Perth 6850, Australia
Victor Hunter: Foundation for Indigenous Sustainable Health, Perth 6850, Australia
Scott Vladimir Martyn: Foundation for Indigenous Sustainable Health, Perth 6850, Australia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-25

Abstract: There is urgent need for a new model to address the housing crisis in remote Australian Indigenous communities. Decades of major government expenditure have not significantly improved the endemic problems, which include homelessness, overcrowding, substandard dwellings, and unemployment. Between 2017–2020, Foundation for Indigenous Sustainable Health (FISH) worked with the remote Kimberley Aboriginal community, Bawoorrooga, by facilitating the co-design and co-build of a culturally and climatically appropriate home with community members. This housing model incorporates a program of education, health, governance, justice system programs, and land tenure reforms. Build features incorporate sustainable local/recycled materials and earth construction, and ‘Solar Passive Design’. The project faced challenges, including limited funding, extreme climate and remoteness, cultural barriers, and mental health issues. Nevertheless, the program was ultimately successful, producing a house which is culturally designed, climatically/thermally effective, comparatively cheap to build, and efficient to run. The project produced improvements in mental health, schooling outcomes, reduced youth incarceration, and other spheres of community development, including enterprise and community governance. Co-design and co-build projects are slower and more complex than the conventional model of external contracting, but the outcomes can be far superior across broad areas of social and emotional wellbeing, house quality and comfort, energy consumption, long-term maintenance, community physical and mental health, pride, and ownership. These factors are essential in breaking intergenerational cycles of poverty, trauma, and engagement with the justice system. This paper provides a narrative case study of the project and outlines the core principles applied and the lessons learned.

Keywords: creating a brighter future; vibrant remote communities; sustainable livelihoods; Aboriginal housing; co-design and co-build; social and emotional wellbeing; earth building; SuperAdobe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5294/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5294/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5294-:d:803941

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5294-:d:803941