Incorporating Landscape Scaling Relations into Catchment Classification for Optimizing Ecological Management
Yingxiang Peng,
Xinliang Liu and
Yi Wang
Additional contact information
Yingxiang Peng: Ecological and Environment Monitoring Center of Hunan, Changsha 410014, China
Xinliang Liu: Key Laboratory of Agro–Ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
Yi Wang: College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-15
Abstract:
The landscape scaling relation challenges catchment ecological management; however, how the scaling relations change among naturally and anthropogenically differentiated catchments is still unknown. In this study, approximately 1500 soil samples were determined; more than 800 households were surveyed; and the landscape pattern was investigated in 120 sub-catchments of a subtropical Chinese urbanizing agricultural catchment. A scalogram and a coefficient of variation of the commonly used landscape metrics were estimated among various grain sizes, to quantify the Strength of Landscape Scale Effects (SSE) among sub-catchments. Natural and anthropogenic determinants for the SSE were determined. Then, the determinants incorporating landscape scaling relation were applied to classify the sub-catchments through the k-means clustering analysis. The SSE presented different spatial heterogeneity across the 120 sub-catchments and was not expectedly related to the scaling relation over the entire catchment, especially for the Contagion index and Shannon’s Evenness Index. The SSE were significantly related to natural and anthropogenic factors including the soil sand content, the population density, the relief ratio, and the ratio of arable land to woodland. The four factors combing with landscape scaling relations contributed to the four gratifying convergent categories for the 120 sub-catchments. Category I with a large relief and less anthropogenic disturbance had higher spatially non-stationary relationship, while categories II, III, and IV, with varying degrees of relatively small relief and strong intensities of anthropogenic disturbance, had a lower spatial heterogeneity of the landscape scaling relation. The results implied that category I was required to strengthen environmental protection of spatial differences, and categories II, III, and IV could ignore the landscape scale effects and even upscaling management to save management resources when carrying out ecological management within. Our findings could minimize uncertainty in ecological planning and provide opportunities for the application of multiple-scale management.
Keywords: landscape heterogeneity; spatial instability; catchment classification; anthropogenic disturbance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5408/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5408/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5408-:d:806369
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().