Information Processing for Quality Assurance in Reverse Logistics Supply Chains: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective

Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama, Nicholas Chileshe, Raufdeen Rameezdeen and Jose Jorge Ochoa
Additional contact information
Madduma Kaluge Chamitha Sanjani Wijewickrama: UniSA STEM—Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Nicholas Chileshe: UniSA STEM—Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Raufdeen Rameezdeen: UniSA STEM—Sustainable Infrastructure and Resource Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Jose Jorge Ochoa: Australian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, issue 9, 1-31

Abstract: Every year, the construction industry produces a large volume of demolition waste (DW) recovered through reverse logistics supply chains (RLSCs). Information-centric QA plays an important role in the RLSC, providing an excellent solution for inferior-quality reprocessed products. However, information deficiency creates epistemic uncertainties that lead to information-processing needs (IPNs) for QA, for which the internal stakeholders in the RLSC should respond by undertaking appropriate information-processing mechanisms (IPMs). Given this, the current study aims to explore how internal stakeholders process information for QA in RLSC of DW through the organizational information processing theory (OIPT) perspective. The study follows a qualitative approach encompassing 30 semi-structured interviews with internal and external stakeholders in the RLSC of DW. The study found eight uncertainties that stem from the internal organizational environment and two uncertainties caused by the interactions with stakeholders in the supply chain. In addition, 15 IPMs were identified, which the demolishers and waste processors could undertake in response to the epistemic uncertainties. The study developed an information-processing management framework that would serve practitioners and academics to understand how effectively process, people, policy and technology elements contribute to responding to the epistemic uncertainties for successful QA in RLSC of DW.

Keywords: demolition waste; epistemic uncertainties; information-processing mechanisms; information-processing needs; organizational information processing theory; quality assurance; reverse logistics supply chains (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5493/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5493/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5493-:d:807916

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().