Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing

Vivek Arulnathan (), Mohammad Davoud Heidari, Maurice Doyon, Eric P. H. Li and Nathan Pelletier
Additional contact information
Vivek Arulnathan: FIP 226, Food Systems PRISM Lab, Fipke Centre for Innovative Research, University of British Columbia—Okanagan Campus, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
Mohammad Davoud Heidari: FIP 226, Food Systems PRISM Lab, Fipke Centre for Innovative Research, University of British Columbia—Okanagan Campus, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
Maurice Doyon: Faculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Laval University, Paul-Comtois, Building 2425, Rue de l’Agriculture, Local 4418-A, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Eric P. H. Li: Faculty of Management, University of British Columbia Okanagan, EME 4125, 1137 Alumni Avenue, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
Nathan Pelletier: FIP 226, Food Systems PRISM Lab, Fipke Centre for Innovative Research, University of British Columbia—Okanagan Campus, 3247 University Way, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-27

Abstract: Life Cycle Costing (LCC) is universally accepted as the method of choice for economic assessment in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) but the singular focus on costs is ineffective in representing the multiple facets of economic sustainability. This review intends to identify other economic indicators to potentially complement the use of LCC in LCSA. Papers for the review were identified in the Web of Science Core Collection database for the years 2010–2021. The shortlisted indicators were analyzed using 18 criteria. The 21 indicators analyzed performed well with respect to the review criteria for indicator methodology and use but most are unsuitable for direct integration into the LCC/LCSA framework due to the inability to aggregate across life cycles and a lack of correspondingly granular data. The indicators were grouped into six economic impact categories—profitability, productivity, innovation, stability, customers, and autonomy—each of which represents a significant aspect of economic sustainability. On this basis, a conceptual framework is proposed that could maintain the utility of LCC while integrating additional indicators to enable more holistic economic assessments in LCSA. Considering additional economic indicators in LCSA ensures that the positive aspects of LCC are preserved while also improving economic assessment in LCSA.

Keywords: sustainability assessment; life cycle thinking; life cycle costing; economic indicators; economic assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/13/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/13/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:13-:d:1008807

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().