Ground Reaction of Lightly Overconsolidated Subsoil in Reinforced Piled Embankment under Cyclic Loads

Yan Zhuang, Xiangwei Song and Kangyu Wang ()
Additional contact information
Yan Zhuang: Department of Road and Bridge Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
Xiangwei Song: Department of Road and Bridge Engineering, School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
Kangyu Wang: School of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China

Sustainability, 2022, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-19

Abstract: Subsoil support is generally ignored in the design of reinforced piled embankments, resulting in a very conservative design for settlement control. This design philosophy may lead to an unnecessary increase in construction costs, especially for embankments constructed over subsoil of medium and high compressibility (i.e., compression index of subsoil larger than 0.2). This paper presents the ground reaction of lightly overconsolidated subsoil in a reinforced piled embankment subjected to cyclic loads for the purpose of investigating the general behavior of lightly overconsolidated subsoil, and it promotes the sustainable development of piled embankment technology. The ground reaction of subsoil under both static and cyclic loads was comprehensively analyzed in terms of settlement and incremental vertical stress, which exhibited approximately the same profile. However, the settlement of lightly overconsolidated subsoil under a cyclic load was 23% larger than that under a static load. A parametric study was then performed under cyclic loads, and the results showed that the vertical stress carried by the subsoil was the most sensitive to the pile spacing amongst all the parameters considered in this paper. The analysis demonstrated an approximately 88% increase in stress when spacing was enlarged from 2.0 to 3.0 m. Finally, a modified analytical method for the ground reaction of lightly overconsolidated subsoil under cyclic loads was presented, and it showed reasonable agreement with the numerical simulation, particularly for relatively low geogrid stiffnesses, low embankment height (<6.5 m), and small pile spacing (e.g., 2–3 m center to center).

Keywords: numerical simulation; lightly overconsolidated subsoil; reinforced piled embankment; cyclic loads (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/619/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/619/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:619-:d:1019458

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().