Eucalyptus Carbon Stock Research in an Integrated Livestock-Forestry System in Brazil
Marina Moura Morales (),
Hélio Tonini,
Maurel Behling and
Aaron Kinyu Hoshide
Additional contact information
Marina Moura Morales: Embrapa Florestas, Estrada da Ribeira, Km 111, Guaraituba, Caixa Posta 319, Colombo 83411-000, PR, Brazil
Hélio Tonini: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, Rodovia BR-153, Km 632.9 Vila Industrial, Zona Rural, Caixa Postal 242, Bagé 96401-970, RS, Brazil
Maurel Behling: Embrapa Agrosilvopastoral, Rodovia dos Pioneiros MT-222, Km 2.5, Zona Rural Caixa Postal 343, Sinop 78550-970, MT, Brazil
Aaron Kinyu Hoshide: College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture, The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 10, 1-16
Abstract:
Eucalyptus plantations play an important role in capturing and storing atmospheric carbon, mitigating global climate change. Forest management policies encouraging integrated livestock-forestry systems require quantitative estimates of temporal and spatial patterns of carbon storage for these agricultural systems. This study quantified the effects of eucalyptus management and arrangement on carbon stock dynamics in integrated livestock-forestry (ILF) systems versus monoculture eucalyptus plantings. Arrangement and management resulted in equal storage of carbon in both monoculture and ILF systems (34.7 kg per tree). Both factors are important to better understand how forest species in integrated systems stock carbon and how this can compensate for other agricultural system components, such as cattle. The extent to which ILF systems offset beef cattle ( Nellore ) emissions was determined by estimating changes in carbon stock over time for Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis , clone H13, under three scenarios (S) of wood use. These scenarios were (S1) tree growth without thinning, (S2) trees used for biomass energy without thinning, and (S3) 50% of trees used for biomass energy at five years old and 50% of trees used for both timber and energy after eight years, considering the full life cycle of eucalyptus. The S1 and S3 systems can stock 510 and 73 metric tons (t) of CO 2 ha −1 , respectively, while S2 emits 115 t CO 2 ha −1 of biogenic carbon.
Keywords: carbon mitigation; carbon sequestration; carbon storage; climate change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7750/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7750/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7750-:d:1142503
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().