EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Long-Term Performance Assessment of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Railway Substructure

Ahmet F. Esen (), Peter K. Woodward, Omar Laghrouche and David P. Connolly
Additional contact information
Ahmet F. Esen: Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
Peter K. Woodward: Institute for High-Speed Rail and System Integration, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Omar Laghrouche: Institute for Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
David P. Connolly: Institute for High-Speed Rail and System Integration, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 12, 1-24

Abstract: Significant savings in carbon emissions, cost, and time could be achieved via the reduction in maintenance frequency, capital costs of track construction, and land used. Geosynthetic-reinforced soils offer such sustainable solutions. The experimental work presented in this paper investigates the long-term performance of a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall (GRS-RW) system as an alternative to the conventional railway embankment. Full-scale testing was carried out on three sleeper sections of ballasted and slab tracks by simulating train loads cyclically, phased to 360 km/h. The tracks were supported by either a low-level fully confined conventional embankment or a GRS-RW substructure. The substructures were formed of a 1.2 m deep subgrade and frost protection layer, in accordance with high-speed railway design standards. The overall aim was to assess the performance of the tracks, in terms of transient displacements and total settlements. It was observed that once the GRS-RW system reached its active state, it deformed in a very similar way to a conventional embankment despite the fact that the GRS-RW system is less confined than the conventional embankment. The results indicate that the cumulative settlement of the slab track, which is due to the plastic deformation of the soil, is significantly less than that of the ballasted track, which is primarily caused by the movement of the ballast particles.

Keywords: full-scale testing; railway track settlement; geosynthetic-reinforced soil; ballasted track; slab track (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9364/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9364/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9364-:d:1167808

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9364-:d:1167808