Multicriteria Decision-Making Tools for the Selection of Biomasses as Supplementary Cementitious Materials

Germán Álvarez-López (), Alejandra María Múnera and Juan G. Villegas
Additional contact information
Germán Álvarez-López: Grupo Calidad, Metrología y Producción, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín 050036, Colombia
Alejandra María Múnera: Grupo Calidad, Metrología y Producción, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín 050036, Colombia
Juan G. Villegas: ALIADO—Analytics and Research for Decision Making, Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: Using biomass ash to partially replace cement reduces the cement industry’s environmental impact and prevents these agro-industrial wastes from ending up in landfills, eroding soils, or being openly burned. This research aims to select three biomasses to produce supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) through the analytic hierarchy process, considering expert judgments from different domains. Complementary to up-to-date research, we evaluated biomasses taking into account biomass production, ash obtained from combustion, and logistics processes for supplying concrete plants with SCM. We also dealt with an industrial context instead of a laboratory one and validated our approach on a real case study using Colombian data. The results indicate experts count the technical viability of biomass (concrete properties) as the most crucial criteria, followed by the availability and transport characteristics of the waste (production criteria) and the combustion process as the least important criteria. In the baseline scenario (all experts’ judgments having the same weights), we found that cane bagasse is the best alternative, thanks to its large and highly concentrated production, even if it is not the biomass with the best pozzolanic properties. We also analyzed other scenarios in which we changed the weights of the experts’ judgments and the importance of the criteria. We found that cane bagasse, rice husk, and palm rachis remain the three biomasses selected as SCM, showing the robustness of the proposed multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology. The results provide a methodological reference to appraise biomasses for SCM nationally, using a MCDM framework in a group decision-making context.

Keywords: supplementary cementitious materials; biomasses; multicriteria decision-making; analytic hierarchy process; group decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10031/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10031/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10031-:d:1178631

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().