Assessment of Vietnam Tourism Recovery Strategies after COVID-19 Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Wu-Chung Lin, Chihkang Kenny Wu, Thi Kim Trang Le () and Ngoc Anh Nguyen ()
Additional contact information
Wu-Chung Lin: Tourism Management Department, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan
Chihkang Kenny Wu: Tourism Management Department, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan
Thi Kim Trang Le: Tourism Management Department, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan
Ngoc Anh Nguyen: Tourism Management Department, Business Intelligence School, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 811213, Taiwan

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 13, 1-22

Abstract: Tourism is the economic sector most heavily influenced by COVID-19, and it has suffered unprecedented losses. The competitiveness and resilience of the tourism industry have recently become a topic of great concern for global stakeholders. A series of ambitious recovery strategies have been announced by countries to rebuild the tourism industry, that aim to make “smokeless industry” more resilient and sustainable. The objective of this study is to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of nine recovery strategies in the post-COVID-19 period for Vietnam’s tourism industry. A combined model of the Best–Worst Method (BWM) and the Group Best Worst Method (GBWM), an efficient tool using the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, is used to rank the tourism solutions. The assessment process is carried out by six stakeholder groups considered decision makers, including tourism operators, enterprises, scholars, employees, residents, and tourists. In the context of Vietnam, the most influential tourism recovery strategy is using innovative tourism business models (ST2), which is a solid step forward in utilizing potential resources, meeting current tourism needs, and adapting to natural changes. The model results reflect that the tourism model’s restructuring is necessary to provide new types of experiences and entertainment suitable for the new tourism context. The findings illustrate that the priority of strategies depends on the perception of decision-makers, levels of involvement in the tourism industry, and local conditions. The study has contributed a theoretical framework for tourism recovery solutions and decision support in the post-pandemic stage. The model can be applied to other countries worldwide in improving tourism performance or assisting in decision-making for similar issues.

Keywords: tourism recovery; tourism strategy; post COVID-19; Best–Worst Method; group Best–Worst Method; multi-criteria decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10047/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10047/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10047-:d:1178875

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().