Organic and Slow-Release Fertilizer Substitution Strategies Improved the Sustainability of Pineapple Production Systems in the Tropics

Jinwen Cai, Wenxiao Cheng, Zhenghao Liang, Changzhen Li, Yan Deng, Tao Yin and Changjiang Li ()
Additional contact information
Jinwen Cai: Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Wenxiao Cheng: Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Zhenghao Liang: Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Changzhen Li: Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Yan Deng: College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China
Tao Yin: Hainan Tian-Di-Ren Ecological Agriculture Incorporated Company, Haikou 570228, China
Changjiang Li: Hainan Key Laboratory for Sustainable Utilization of Tropical Bioresource, College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: The partial substitution of chemical nitrogen fertilizers with organic fertilizer and slow-release fertilizer could improve pineapple yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the effect of organic and slow-release fertilizer substitution strategies on the carbon footprint (CF), nitrogen footprint (NF) and net ecosystem economic benefits (NEEB) from pineapple fields in the tropics remains largely unclear. Therefore, we conducted a long-term pineapple field trial (2017–2021) for the first time with five fertilization strategies (CK: no fertilizer; F: conventional fertilization(nitrogen (N) 817 kg ha −1 , phosphorus pentoxide (P 2 O 5 ) 336 kg ha −1 , potassium oxide (K 2 O) 945 kg ha −1 ); RF: reduction of 41.7% N, 72.0% P 2 O 5 and 33.1% K 2 O on an F basis; RFO: replacement of 20% N input with organic fertilizer on an RF basis; RFOS: replacement of 15% N input with slow-release fertilizer on an RFO basis) to identify the pineapple fruit yield, NUE, CF, NF and NEEB in the tropics. The results showed that in comparison to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved pineapple yield (7.6%, 12.4% and 26.3%, respectively), NUE (66.4%, 75.5% and 87.7%, respectively, p < 0.05) and partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFP N ) fertilizer (84.8%, 92.8% and 116.7%, respectively, p < 0.05). Additionally, of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the highest yield (87.8 t ha −1 ). N leaching (50.1–69.1%) and ammonia volatilization (21.6–26.2%) were the two primary routes for reactive nitrogen (Nr) loss. The field soils (36.8–45.7%) and N fertilizer production and transportation (21.2–29.5%) dominated the GHG emissions. Compared to the F treatment, the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments showed decreases in Nr losses, NF, GHG emissions and CF of 36.6–41.1%, 43.3–51.9%, 19.0–29.1% and 24.5–41.7%, respectively. Of all the treatments, the RFOS treatment had the lowest CF (191.8 kg CO 2 eq ha −1 season) and NF (1.9 kg N t −1 season). Additionally, the NEEB of the RF, RFO and RFOS treatments improved by 13.0–39.9% over that of the F treatment. The RFOS treatment (54,880 USD ha −1 ) resulted in the highest NEEB of all treatments. Therefore, the substitution of conventional inorganic fertilizers with organic and slow-release fertilizers is an effective method for achieving sustainable pineapple production. However, a process for further reducing GHG emissions from farmland soils and Nr losses from organic fertilizer addition still need attention in terms of pineapple production.

Keywords: fruit yield; nitrogen use efficiency; ammonia volatilization; nitrogen leaching; greenhouse gas emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10353/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10353/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10353-:d:1183880

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().