Effect of Cotton Gin Trash Supplementation as Unconventional Feedstuff on Feed Intake and Production Characteristics of Mecheri Sheep of India
Sri Balaji Nagarajan,
Subramaniam Ramakrishnan,
Jaganathan Muralidharan,
Palanisamy Vasan,
Karuppusamy Sivakumar and
Aranganoor Kannan Thiruvenkadan ()
Additional contact information
Sri Balaji Nagarajan: Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Namakkal 637002, India
Subramaniam Ramakrishnan: Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Salem 636112, India
Jaganathan Muralidharan: Mecheri Sheep Research Station, Salem 636451, India
Palanisamy Vasan: Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Theni 625534, India
Karuppusamy Sivakumar: Faculty of Food and Agriculture, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine 999183, Trinidad and Tobago
Aranganoor Kannan Thiruvenkadan: Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Salem 636112, India
Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 13, 1-16
Abstract:
This study investigated the effects of feeding cotton gin trash (CGT) to Mecheri ram lambs, as an alternate diet, on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality. A growth performance trial was conducted with thirty-two weaned Mecheri ram lambs with an average body weight of 12.64 ± 0.74 kg, which were assigned to four groups (n = eight animals in each group). The diet’s roughage part was replaced by CGT at percentages of 0% (T 1 ), 25% (T 2 ), 50% (T 3 ), and 75% (T 4 ). The growth trial lasted six months (180 days) from weaning lambs at 3–4 months until 9 months for marketing. All the animals were fed on a dry matter requirement basis at 4% of their body weight. The study revealed that the lambs fed with 50 (T 3 ) and 75 (T 4 ) % inclusion levels of CGT showed significantly ( p < 0.01) higher total body weight gain than the T 1 and T 2 groups. The average daily gain of lambs in T 3 (99.24 g) and T 4 (105.51 g) were significantly ( p < 0.01) higher than T 1 (80.77 g) and T 2 (83.61 g) groups. Throughout the study period, there was no statistically significant ( p > 0.05) difference in the average Dry Matter Intake (DMI) (g) between the groups; however, the lambs in T 4 demonstrated higher feed efficiency (7.4) than the T 1 (9.3) group. The slaughter studies revealed that the lambs in the T 4 followed by the T 3 groups registered significantly ( p < 0.01) higher hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, and meat: bone ratio than T 2 and T 1 group animals. The T 3 and T 4 groups had significantly ( p < 0.05) higher weights of the liver, spleen, head, stomach, and empty intestines when compared to T 1 and T 2 groups; however, there was no significant ( p > 0.05) difference in the weights of edible and inedible offals. In addition, there were no significant variations ( p > 0.05) in pH, WHC, shear force value, sensory characteristics, and proximate composition of meat among treatment groups. The SFA levels in the T 3 , T 4 , and T 2 groups were substantially ( p < 0.01) greater than in the control group (T 1 ). In contrast, the proportion of MUFA in the T 1 group was significantly ( p < 0.05) greater than in the T 3 and T 4 treatment groups. There was no significant difference in PUFA or the PUFA/SFA ratio between the treatment groups. In accordance with current research findings, the CGT can be added up to 75% of the roughage component in sheep feed as an effective unconventional supplementation, as it improves body weight, feed efficiency, and carcass characteristics in Mecheri ram lambs.
Keywords: cotton gin trash; growth performance; Mecheri ram lambs; carcass characteristics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10500/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10500/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10500-:d:1186223
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().