Comparative Analysis of Helical Piles and Granular Anchor Piles for Foundation Stabilization in Expansive Soil: A 3D Numerical Study

Ammar Alnmr (), Richard Paul Ray and Rashad Alsirawan
Additional contact information
Ammar Alnmr: Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
Richard Paul Ray: Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary
Rashad Alsirawan: Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 15, 1-36

Abstract: This study investigates the performance of granular anchor piles and helical piles in expansive soils. Expansive soils pose challenges for engineering due to their significant swelling and shrinkage characteristics. Special considerations are required for constructing foundations on expansive soil to mitigate volumetric changes. While helical piles provide uplift resistance in light structures, they may not fully stabilize foundations in expansive soils. In contrast, granular anchor piles offer a simpler alternative for resisting uplift forces. A numerical study was conducted to analyze the pullout loads, compressive loads, and heave behavior of these anchor techniques. The results demonstrate that granular anchor piles outperform helical piles in terms of pullout and compressive performance, with improvements ranging from 17% to 22.5% in pullout capacity and 0.5% to 19% in compressive capacity, depending on specific pile lengths and diameters examined. However, both techniques show similar effectiveness in reducing heave, achieving reductions of over 90% when specific conditions are met. Additionally, the use of high-rise cap piles contributes to significant heave reduction, effectively minimizing heave to nearly negligible levels compared to low-rise cap piles. It is found that the relative density of the granular material has a more pronounced effect on the pullout load compared to the compressive load, and its impact varies depending on the length of the pile. Therefore, it is recommended to avoid high relative density when the pile is entirely within the expansive soil while utilizing higher relative density is beneficial when the pile penetrates and settles in the stable zone.

Keywords: expansive soils; granular anchor piles; helical piles; pullout load; compressive load; heave behavior; foundation stabilization; numerical simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11975/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11975/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11975-:d:1210191

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().