Climate and Biodiversity Credentials for Australian Grass-Fed Beef: A Review of Standards, Certification and Assurance Schemes

Dean T. Thomas (), Gonzalo Mata, Andrew F. Toovey, Peter W. Hunt, Gene Wijffels, Rebecca Pirzl, Maren Strachan and Brad G. Ridoutt
Additional contact information
Dean T. Thomas: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia
Gonzalo Mata: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia
Andrew F. Toovey: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia
Peter W. Hunt: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
Gene Wijffels: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St. Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
Rebecca Pirzl: CSIRO Environment, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
Maren Strachan: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
Brad G. Ridoutt: CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 18, 1-33

Abstract: Extensive livestock production occupies 25% of the ice-free terrestrial surface of the Earth, and Australian beef production contributes about 10% of this total land footprint. Therefore, the management of cattle has major implications for natural vegetation, soils, biodiversity, and atmospheric greenhouse gases in Australia and globally. To meet global sustainability targets and consumer expectations, a variety of environmental Standards, Certification and Assurance (SCA) schemes are being developed and implemented to enable producers to verify claims relating to their products. Improved standardization and coordination are now needed to address the rapid proliferation of credentialing systems that use different frameworks, methods and levels of scientific verification. Using the Australian grass-fed beef industry as a case study, we identified the measures, metrics and methods that are currently used by SCA schemes for climate and biodiversity credentialing. From here, a co-design process with industry representatives was applied to develop recommendations for credentialing in extensive beef production, feedlots and meat processing. It was clear that the successful adoption of credentialing by beef producers will require flexible and user-friendly support tools that use scalable data sources such as existing producer records, agtech databases and remote sensing information. Substantive rewards and incentives will be required to support producer engagement with the SCA schemes. Overall, ’more needs to be done to ensure the transparency of schemes and to meet benchmarks for integrity such as determining uncertainty and support though peer-reviewed science.

Keywords: grassland; livestock; climate change; adaptation; mitigation; grazing system; biodiversity; ecosystem health; food security; environmental claims (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13935/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13935/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13935-:d:1243474

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().