Estimating Environmental and Economic Impacts of Hermetic Bag Storage Technology

Ma. Cristine Concepcion D. Ignacio (), Kurt A. Rosentrater and Dirk E. Maier
Additional contact information
Ma. Cristine Concepcion D. Ignacio: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA
Kurt A. Rosentrater: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA
Dirk E. Maier: Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 20, 1-19

Abstract: Hermetic bag storage is a growing innovative technology that can effectively mitigate insect activity in stored grain and preserve quality without pesticides. This study aimed to estimate the environmental and economic impacts of hermetic storage bags as the basis for the sustainable adoption of the technology. This study demonstrated an approach to estimate the environmental impact of using hermetic bags and their superior economic benefits for storing maize at the 1-ton scale over three years. The life cycle assessment (LCA) of six commercially available hermetic bags (AgroZ ® , GrainPro, Storezo, ZeroFly ® , Elite, and PICS™) from cradle to grave was evaluated and compared using the Sustainable Minds LCA software. The gas barrier liners were analyzed for structure and polymer composition using confocal microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The results showed that bag manufacturing had the highest environmental impact contribution, with 84.6% to 90.8% of the total impacts (mPt). The carbon footprint contribution of the total service life delivered for one hermetic bag ranged from 1.1 to 1.7 kg CO 2eq . The economic benefits of using hermetic bags were calculated and compared with traditional storage bag methods for one smallholder farmer using ten (10) hermetic bags storing 100 kg/bag (1 ton) of maize. The results found that using hermetic bags exhibited the highest profit of 1130 USD when used for nine months over three years, while storage loss was maintained at less than 1%.

Keywords: benefits; capital cost; carbon footprint; hermetic storage bags; life cycle analysis (LCA); operational cost; polyethylene; profit; storage loss; techno-economic assessment (TEA) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14850/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14850/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14850-:d:1259139

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().