EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluating the Printability and Rheological and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Earthen Mixes for Carbon-Neutral Buildings

Shiva Bhusal, Reza Sedghi and Maryam Hojati ()
Additional contact information
Shiva Bhusal: Department of Civil, Construction, Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Reza Sedghi: Department of Civil, Construction, Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Maryam Hojati: Department of Civil, Construction, Environmental Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 21, 1-23

Abstract: This research delves into the vital aspect of adapting local soil properties for 3D printing and explores the mix design of collected earthen materials to tackle challenges in printability, shrinkage, and mechanical properties. Initially, soil samples from six local sites underwent characterization based on Atterberg’s limits, focusing on identifying the most suitable high-clay-content soil. The soil with a higher clay content was used for further study, and its clay type was determined using an X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, revealing the presence of 49% kaolinite, 15% nontronite, and 36% illite clay minerals. Four earthen mixes were designed by including stabilizers (i.e., hydrated lime), natural pozzolana, and degradable natural fibers (wheat straw fiber). Subsequently, the study examined their rheological properties, shrinkage behavior, compressive and flexural strength, and printability (including extrudability and buildability). The pure soil mixture excelled in printing quality and mechanical strength, but suffered from cracking and drying shrinkage due to its high nontronite clay content. The existence of 15% nontronite clay mineral in the soil resulted in significant shrinkage and extensive cracking of specimens. However, fiber incorporation effectively mitigated large cracks and reduced shrinkage to as low as 2.6%. Despite initial expectations, introducing lime and pozzolana as soil stabilizers did not improve strength, prevent shrinkage, or improve the printability of soil mixes.

Keywords: 3D printing; earthen materials; local soil; soil stabilizer; carbon-neutral building materials; clay minerals; shrinkage; nontronite (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15617/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15617/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15617-:d:1274060

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15617-:d:1274060