Determining the Optimal Sample Size for Assessing Crown Damage on Color Infrared (CIR) Aerial Photographs

Jelena Kolić (), Renata Pernar, Ante Seletković, Anamarija Jazbec and Mario Ančić
Additional contact information
Jelena Kolić: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Renata Pernar: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Ante Seletković: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Anamarija Jazbec: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Mario Ančić: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 22, 1-14

Abstract: One of the priorities in sustainable forest management is monitoring the health status of trees and stands. From the aspect of remote sensing (RS), the best way of doing this is by interpreting color infrared (CIR) aerial photographs; however, this raises the issue of sample size. For this reason, to apply this method in practice, it is indispensable to determine an appropriate sample size to ensure sufficient reliability of the health status assessment of trees in CIR aerial photographs. This research was conducted in lowland forests of pedunculate oak in Croatia. To determine damage in the photographs of the main tree species, a systematic sample with varying dot grid densities—100 × 100 m, 200 × 200 m, 300 × 300 m, 500 × 500 m, 1000 × 1000 m—was used with combinations of different numbers of interpreted trees per sample. Damage indicators were also calculated based on tree distributions obtained by interpreting four trees, two trees and one tree in different sample sizes. The results of the testing showed that there were no statistically significant differences between different sample densities and numbers of interpreted trees in relation to mean damage assessment. Regardless of the fact that there were no statistically significant differences during damage assessment, it was found that by lowering sample densities, starting with 200 × 200 m, the number of trees and the number of sample points per particular sub-compartment significantly decreased, and so did the desired accuracy. Consequently, the participation (distribution) of particular species and damage degrees in the sample were lost, which significantly affected the overall tree health assessment. In contrast, grid densities of 100 × 100 m with one interpreted tree at the raster point proved to be the optimal sample size. This confirms the fact found in earlier research, that is, that the selected sample should have several spatially well-distributed points with a smaller number of trees in the point, and samples with larger numbers of trees in a smaller number of points should be avoided.

Keywords: visual interpretation of CIR aerial photographs; damage assessment; optimal sample size; digital photogrammetric workstation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15918/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15918/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15918-:d:1279701

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().