The Paradox of Privatization in Inland Fisheries Management: Lessons from a Traditional System

Irkhamiawan Ma’ruf (), Mohammad Mukhlis Kamal, Arif Satria, Sulistiono, Alin Halimatussadiah and Yudi Setiawan
Additional contact information
Irkhamiawan Ma’ruf: Study Program of Natural Resources and Environmental Management Science, Postgraduate School, IPB University, Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, Bogor 16151, Indonesia
Mohammad Mukhlis Kamal: Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Arif Satria: Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Sulistiono: Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Alin Halimatussadiah: Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
Yudi Setiawan: Department of Conservation of Forest Resources and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 23, 1-13

Abstract: Privatization, often proposed as a means to regulate natural resource use, sometimes paradoxically leads to overexploitation and social exclusion. Within the unique context of Ogan Komering Ilir (OKI) Regency, Indonesia, the privatization of swamp floodplains and rivers via the “Lelang Lebak, Lebung, Sungai” (L3S) system is a testament to this dilemma. L3S grants auction winners exclusive rights to fish, thereby privatizing common-pool resources. This study delves into the intricacies of the L3S mechanism, highlighting its significance in guiding inland fisheries’ management. Through stakeholder analysis, we pinpoint the crucial actors, as well as their interests, influence, and interrelationships. Our investigation revealed 20 distinct stakeholders, each playing different roles within the L3S framework. Based on their influence and vested interests, these stakeholders are categorized as key players, subjects, context setters, and crowds. This classification aids in discerning potential conflicts, cooperation, and synergies. Effective L3S execution hinges on collaboration, especially with pivotal entities such as fishery services, village and district heads, and village-owned enterprises. Insights gathered during the study indicate that while privatization has streamlined resource distribution, it intensifies overfishing and deepens socioeconomic divisions. This study calls for a harmonious blend of historical insights and modern governance, with a central focus on stakeholder collaboration and community involvement.

Keywords: ecosystem management; inland fisheries; lelang lebak lebung; stakeholders’ analysis; system social ecology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16273/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16273/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16273-:d:1287121

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().