Techno-Economic Assessment of APS-Based Poultry Feed Production with a Circular Biorefinery Process

Marta Buccaro (), Armando Toscano, Melissa Balzarotti, Ilaria Re, Diego Bosco and Maurizio Bettiga
Additional contact information
Marta Buccaro: Consorzio Italbiotec, 20126 Milan, Italy
Armando Toscano: Piperà—Persone per Ambienti, Professional Network for Society and Environment, 20127 Milan, Italy
Melissa Balzarotti: Consorzio Italbiotec, 20126 Milan, Italy
Ilaria Re: Consorzio Italbiotec, 20126 Milan, Italy
Diego Bosco: Consorzio Italbiotec, 20126 Milan, Italy
Maurizio Bettiga: Consorzio Italbiotec, 20126 Milan, Italy

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-17

Abstract: Poultry livestock profitability significantly depends on feed, accounting for 60–70% of the total production cost, of which protein sources are among of the most expensive ingredients. The maintenance of profitability while meeting feed demand and reducing the environmental impact represents a considerable challenge driving research of alternative protein sources (APS), such as insects and algae meals. This study employs, for the first time, techno-economic assessment (TEA) methodology to evaluate the technological performance and the industrial feasibility of an APS-based poultry feed production method based on the valorization of the pre-treated organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) as a substrate for Hermetia illucens larval growth and microalgae cultivation. The Excel-based analysis, which evaluated the mass and energy balance as well as the income statement, was integrated with a thematic analysis focused on exploring how the overall value attributed to the sustainability concept is reflected in the willingness to adopt sustainable business models by entrepreneurs in the poultry sector. Despite the ability to generate revenues, the model cannot be said to be profitable for animal feed production due to the strong dependence of its profitability on scale economy logics. Enabling solutions could be derived from the recovery of abandoned infrastructures, government financial incentives, and integrated systems associating OFMSW treatment with poultry farming, thus resulting in marked economic sustainability and profitability: key elements from the poultry entrepreneurs’ point of view.

Keywords: alternative protein sources; techno-economic assessment; feed; poultry sector; circular economy; insects; microalgae; biorefinery; sustainability; thematic analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2195/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2195/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2195-:d:1045879

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().