EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Transportation Justice in Vermont Communities of High Environmental Risk

Bindu Panikkar, Qing Ren () and Fosca Bechthold
Additional contact information
Bindu Panikkar: Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, The University of Vermont Aiken Center, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Qing Ren: Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, The University of Vermont Aiken Center, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Fosca Bechthold: Department of Geography and Geosciences, College of Arts and Sciences, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 3, 1-18

Abstract: Transportation justice studies have largely focused on metropolitan areas, and the transportation disparities in rural areas and their most disadvantaged population are not well understood. Our study explored transportation injustices in high environmental risk communities in Vermont. We found that low-income communities and people of color disproportionately face inequitable access to transportation services: they are more likely to be concerned about lack of transportation, more likely to not own or lease a personal vehicle and rely more heavily on public transportation. Our study also found that those without a personal vehicle and those largely dependent on public transportation have less access to healthy food, are likely to go hungry, have greater reports of asthma, and have less access to primary care physicians and jobs. The transportation policies in the state are also procedurally unjust. These disadvantages, combined with higher exposures to environmental risks, also pose implications for public health and well-being. A combined transition toward sustainable mobility and transportation justice should prioritize greater equity in the distribution of transportation investment in infrastructure and services; recognition of historical patterns that inform current uneven and unequal mobilities; procedural and democratic engagement of the marginalized in transportation design, planning and policy-making; a capabilities approach to plan transportation systems that improve opportunities, wellness, and quality of life for the most disadvantaged population. Consideration should also be given to designing a sustainable transportation transition that prioritizes attention for all modes of transport accessibility and mobility, including non-motorized and public transit modes, in planning and policies so that streets are not dominated by a single mode of transportation, such as cars.

Keywords: transportation justice; environmental justice; transportation planning; sustainable transportation; just transition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2365/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2365/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2365-:d:1049019

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2365-:d:1049019