EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evaluation of Sustainable Development of the Urban Ecological Environment and Its Coupling Relationship with Human Activities Based on Multi-Source Data

Jiangtao Zhao, Li Liu (), Ying Wang, Keming Tang, Miao Huo and Yang Zhao ()
Additional contact information
Jiangtao Zhao: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
Li Liu: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
Ying Wang: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
Keming Tang: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
Miao Huo: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
Yang Zhao: College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 5, 1-16

Abstract: Combining the travel modes of human activities, fully mining multi-source data, and analyzing the relationship between the urban ecological environment and human activities are important topics in urban ecological environment planning. Human activity indicators were constructed based on the data of POI points, OSM road network, and residential areas. Machine learning models such as support vector regression machine, extreme gradient boosting regression, polynomial regression, and random forest regression were combined with remote sensing images to construct an urban ecological environment indicator system. These models were used to conduct regression analysis of urban ecological environment indicators and human activity indicators in Chengdu, China. The research shows that the three indicators of human activities all show a trend of increasing in the center and gradually decreasing in the surrounding areas, while the sustainable urban ecological environment indicators show the opposite trend. On the relationship between urban ecological environment and human activities, XGB has the best effect; the correlation between the street vitality index and the urban function mixing index and the sustainable urban ecological environment is stronger, and the correlation between the walkability measure index of the residential area and the sustainable urban ecological environment is even worse.

Keywords: sustainable; multi-source data; machine learning; ecological environment; human activities; urban (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4340/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4340/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4340-:d:1083771

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4340-:d:1083771