Sustainability Assessment of Intensification Levels of Brazilian Smallholder Integrated Dairy-Crop Production Systems: An Emergy and Economic-Based Decision Approach

Vitória Toffolo Luiz, Rafael Araújo Nacimento (), Vanessa Theodoro Rezende, Taynara Freitas Avelar de Almeida, Juliana Vieira Paz, Biagio Fernando Giannetti and Augusto Hauber Gameiro
Additional contact information
Vitória Toffolo Luiz: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
Rafael Araújo Nacimento: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
Vanessa Theodoro Rezende: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
Taynara Freitas Avelar de Almeida: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
Juliana Vieira Paz: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil
Biagio Fernando Giannetti: Laboratory of Production and Environment, Paulista University, São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil
Augusto Hauber Gameiro: Department of Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, Brazil

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 5, 1-20

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the sustainability of integrated dairy–crop production systems by employing emergy and economic theory perspectives, and to identify strategies to improve the intensification of dairy production systems. A case study of a small Brazilian dairy production system (PROP) was created to assess dairy herd feed exchanges as a sustainability pathway. Three scenarios were proposed for the examination of a dairy production system: extensive (EXT); semi-intensive (SIS); and intensive (INT). The Interlink Decision Making Index (IDMI) was used to compare sustainability among them. The PROP demonstrated higher environmental performance than the other scenarios (ESI = 1.30, 0.65, 0.95, and 0.71, for PROP, INT, SIS, and EXT, respectively); however, PROP’s profitability was 1.6 times lower than that of SIS and INT, although PROP’s profitability was higher than that of the EXT scenario. Notably, the IDMI identified the SIS scenario as having the best sustainability among those studied. We concluded that the consideration of the energy contribution for feed ingredients yields a more equitable evaluation of environmental performance in integrated dairy–crop production systems, which leads us to propose the following suggestions: (i) target higher profit performance by changing extensive dairy systems to semi-intensive systems that utilize feed ingredients produced at the farm, and (ii) promote higher environmental performance by transforming intensive dairy systems to semi-intensive systems that are directed more toward maintaining environmental factors. In our view, public policies should focus on bonifications that upgrade dairy systems to promote and utilize best practices for dairy–crop integration.

Keywords: Brazilian dairy production; dairy smallholder; integrated crop–livestock system; multi-criteria decision approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4674/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4674/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4674-:d:1089040

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().