Climate Change Science and Policy—A Guided Tour across the Space of Attitudes and Outcomes

Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Adam Choryński, Janusz Olejnik, Hans J. Schellnhuber, Marek Urbaniak and Klaudia Ziemblińska ()
Additional contact information
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz: Meteorology Lab., Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60637 Poznan, Poland
Adam Choryński: Meteorology Lab., Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60637 Poznan, Poland
Janusz Olejnik: Meteorology Lab., Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60637 Poznan, Poland
Hans J. Schellnhuber: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14412 Potsdam, Germany
Marek Urbaniak: Meteorology Lab., Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60637 Poznan, Poland
Klaudia Ziemblińska: Meteorology Lab., Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60637 Poznan, Poland

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 6, 1-20

Abstract: The ongoing debate on global climate change has polarized societies since ever. The attitude of an individual towards its anthropogenic nature as well as the need and extent to which human beings should mitigate climate warming can result from a number of factors. Also, since the consequences of such alteration in global climate have no borders and became much more severe in the last decades, it is worth it to shed some more light on a current state of an interplay between scientific findings and climate policies. In this paper, we examine a low-dimensional space of possible attitudes toward climate change, its impact, attribution, and mitigation. Insights into those attitudes and evidence-based interpretations are offered. We review a range of inconvenient truths and convenient untruths, respectively, related to fundamental climate-change issues and derive a systematic taxonomy of climate-change skepticism. In addition, the media track related to climate change is reconstructed by examining a range of cover stories of important magazines and the development of those stories with global warming. In a second major step, we span a low-dimensional space of outcomes of the combined climate science-policy system, where each of the sub-systems may either succeed or fail. We conclude that the most probable outcome from today’s perspective is still the same as it was 12 years ago: a tragic triumph , i.e., the success of climate science and the simultaneous failure of climate policy.

Keywords: climate change; climate science; policy; society; attitudes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5411/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5411/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5411-:d:1101017

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().