Key Corporate Sustainability Assessment Methods for Coal Companies

Ekaterina Blinova (), Tatyana Ponomarenko and Sofiya Tesovskaya
Additional contact information
Ekaterina Blinova: Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Tatyana Ponomarenko: Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia
Sofiya Tesovskaya: Faculty of Economics, Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 7, 1-18

Abstract: Many businesses view sustainability issues as important and design corporate sustainability strategies. However, creating such a strategy does not mean the company will progress in sustainable development because the factors influencing businesses remain largely unexplored. Based on a review of studies on corporate sustainability, we identified the major factors affecting any company’s sustainability. They include government regulation, imperfect management, interaction with stakeholders, corporate self-regulation and self-reflection, and the regulatory framework, and can be consolidated into two groups. We also analyzed the groups of methods that can be used to assess a company’s sustainability: traditional corporate sustainability assessment methods, circular economy assessment methods, ESG assessment methods, and non-financial performance indicators. For each group of methods, limitations were identified, and it was concluded that corporate sustainability assessments should factor in the environment in which the company operates. As part of this study, a lack of methods for assessing the corporate sustainability of coal companies was revealed, along with insufficient consideration of industrial factors in the prior literature. These factors are responsible for incorrect corporate sustainability assessments in the coal industry. Taking into account the division of Russian coal companies into three types (energy companies, metal manufacturers, and coal producers) and the aspects of their functioning against the backdrop of economic restrictions (including sanctions and embargoes), the authors prove that each group of companies requires an individual corporate sustainability assessment methodology.

Keywords: corporate sustainability; sustainable development; coal companies; corporate sustainability factors; corporate sustainability assessment methods; mineral assets; ESG (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5763/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5763/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5763-:d:1107613

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().