EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Modern Sustainable Fish Screens: A Study on Developing Effective Communication with Water Users

Tahmid Nayeem (), Nick Pawsey, Feisal Murshed, Lee Baumgartner, Craig Boys and Tom Rayner
Additional contact information
Tahmid Nayeem: School of Business, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
Nick Pawsey: School of Business, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
Feisal Murshed: School of Business, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
Lee Baumgartner: School of Business, Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
Craig Boys: NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of Regional NSW, Newington, NSW 2127, Australia
Tom Rayner: NSW Department of Primary Industries, Department of Regional NSW, Newington, NSW 2127, Australia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, issue 9, 1-13

Abstract: Background: Recently, there has been a shift in strategic goals relating to water management in Australia, from water development to protecting and restoring environmental assets. Thus, there is a need to develop knowledge that accounts for the new realities of developing an effective communication channel with irrigators. Combining insights from two communication theories: the hierarchy of effects model, AIDA, and the diffusion of innovation (DOI) model, this article explores developing effective communication techniques (e.g., format, style, content, and source) and tools for Australian irrigators regarding adopting new sustainable technology—a modern self-cleaning fish screen. This study investigates irrigators’ communication preferences and innovation processes to understand to sketch foundational strategies for improving communication schemes. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews. Twenty-three irrigators in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia’s primary food bowl, participated in the study. Constructivist grounded theory (CGT) was used to design and analyse the data. Results: The study explored the communications preferences of Australian irrigators and revealed insights into their preferred format, style, content, and source and how information is gathered and evaluated in the decision-making process. The results confirmed that the information must come from trusted sources, be grounded in research, provide hands-on observations/experiences, and focus on benefits for irrigators (i.e., improving irrigation efficiency) to be impactful. Broadly, this study contributes to the discussion of policy formulation, enhancing technology adoption in a broader setting and designing efficient and effective systems for engaging with Australian irrigators. Conclusions: To increase the likelihood of adopting fish screens, it is essential to implement targeted education and information programs and communications in appropriate formats with relevant content.

Keywords: fish screen; NSW irrigators; qualitative approach; AIDA model; communication channels (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7694/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7694/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7694-:d:1141746

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7694-:d:1141746