Balancing Forest Regulations and Stakeholder Needs in Latvia: Modeling the Long-Term Impacts of Forest Management Strategies on Standing Volume and Carbon Storage

Daiga Zute, Valters Samariks, Guntars Šņepsts, Jānis Donis and Āris Jansons ()
Additional contact information
Daiga Zute: Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
Valters Samariks: Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
Guntars Šņepsts: Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
Jānis Donis: Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia
Āris Jansons: Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas 111, LV-2169 Salaspils, Latvia

Sustainability, 2023, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: Forest ecosystems are significant carbon pools on a global scale, and also a source of renewable raw materials. Moreover, the European Union (EU) aims to tackle climate change and reach climate neutrality; therefore, forest regulations are designed to promote sustainable forest management practices and ensure the long-term health and productivity of forests. It is important to balance regulatory requirements with the economic, social, and environmental needs of forest stakeholders. This study analyses four theoretical scenarios (business as usual, green deal, intensive forestry, and intensive forestry with afforestation) and prognoses the management impact on standing volume and carbon stock in living trees and harvested wood products (HWPs). Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate different theoretical forest management scenarios to predict changes in standing volume and carbon stock in living tree biomass and HWPs for the 100 next years. The results suggest that intensive targeted forestry practices may enhance carbon sequestration and were found to be the most suitable strategy for Latvia’s hemiboreal zone, as they balance economic benefits with carbon sequestration and ecosystem services. The obtained results can be valuable for policymakers and forest managers to promote sustainability and balance the diverse needs of society and forest stakeholders.

Keywords: climate change; forestry; green deal; harvested wood products; intensive forestry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/280/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/280/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:280-:d:1309215

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().