EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Microplastics in Water: A Review of Characterization and Removal Methods

Yun Li, Ping Chen, Yalan Tang, Yanjing Yang, Chengyun Zhou, Jiaqi Bu () and Shian Zhong ()
Additional contact information
Yun Li: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Ping Chen: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yalan Tang: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Yanjing Yang: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Chengyun Zhou: College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China
Jiaqi Bu: Hunan Haili Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Changsha 410007, China
Shian Zhong: College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 10, 1-27

Abstract: Microplastics (MPs), as an emerging persistent pollutant, exist and accumulate in the environment, which has garnered them considerable global attention. While the origin, dispersion, distribution, and impact of MPs have been extensively documented, the characterization and removal strategies for MPs present ongoing challenges. In this literature review, we introduce in detail the advantages and disadvantages of seven characterization methods, from macroscopic to microscopic, from visual observation to microscopic characterization, and discuss their scope of application. In addition, 12 treatment schemes were summarized from the three treatment directions of physics, chemistry, and biology, including filtration, adsorption, extraction, magnetic separation, oil film separation, Fenton oxidation, electrochemical oxidation, persulfate advanced oxidation, photocatalytic oxidation, coagulation, electrocoagulation, foam flotation, anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic activated sludge, enzymatic degradation, bacterial degradation, and fungal degradation. Additionally, we present a critical assessment of the advantages and drawbacks associated with these removal strategies. Building upon the findings of our research team, we propose a novel approach to degrade MPs, which combines three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation technology with persulfate advanced oxidation technology. This advanced oxidation technology achieves 100% degradation of antibiotics in water, can degrade large molecules into environmentally harmless small molecules, and should also be a very good strategy for the degradation of MPs. Compared with two-dimensional electrocatalytic technology, the degradation efficiency is higher and the degradation cost is lower This review intends to propel further advancements for addressing the issue of MP pollution.

Keywords: microplastics; removal technologies; characterization methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4033/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4033/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4033-:d:1392663

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4033-:d:1392663