Research on Fuzzy Evaluation of Land Environmental Security in Three Provinces of Northeast China

Yu Wang, Hanru Zhou, Yanlong Guo () and Linfu Zhang
Additional contact information
Yu Wang: Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
Hanru Zhou: Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
Yanlong Guo: Social Innovation Design Research Center, Anhui University, Hefei 203106, China
Linfu Zhang: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB 122, UK

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 12, 1-22

Abstract: Among the world’s most important three chief black lands, China’s northeast region is a vital hub for the commercial extraction of grain, undertaking the task of grain reserves and special transfers. Utilizing the provincial data of the three northeastern provinces from 2010 to 2021, and using existing documents and records as essential elements, we structured a land security appraisal system with five criterion layers and 21 indicator layers of pressure, state, impact, response, and management. The three provinces in the northeast were evaluated for the security of their land resources using the entropy-dependent weight-TOPSIS pattern. The study findings indicate that: (1) In general, land resource security of the three northeastern provinces shows a pattern of decline followed by a gradual increase from 2012 to 2021, and there is a steady improvement in the level of land’s ecological stability; (2) There are differences in the ecological stability of the soil across cities and provinces, with Heilongjiang Province having the best land security status and Liaoning Province having the worst; (3) The amount of soil erosion in tiny watersheds is the indicator that has the biggest influence on land ecological stability in the three provinces in the northeast; (4) The response layer is the criterion layer that has the strongest correlation with land ecological safety.

Keywords: land resource security; northeastern provinces; PSIRM modeling framework; fuzzy evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4907/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/12/4907/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:12:p:4907-:d:1411009

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().