Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behaviors in Adolescence: A Scoping Review

Anne-Sophie Denault (), Maxim Bouchard, Jasmine Proulx, François Poulin, Véronique Dupéré, Isabelle Archambault and Marie Denise Lavoie
Additional contact information
Anne-Sophie Denault: Department of Educational Fundamentals and Practices, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Maxim Bouchard: Department of Educational Fundamentals and Practices, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Jasmine Proulx: Department of Educational Fundamentals and Practices, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
François Poulin: Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada
Véronique Dupéré: School of Psychoeducation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
Isabelle Archambault: School of Psychoeducation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
Marie Denise Lavoie: Library Consulting Services, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 13, 1-38

Abstract: Today’s adolescents will inevitably face the negative effects of climate change and will need to engage in pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) as part of the solutions. The primary objective of this scoping review was to identify the individual, peer and family, and school and community predictors of PEB in adolescence. The secondary objectives were to highlight the main types of PEBs, the main conceptual frameworks examined in adolescence, and the main research gaps mentioned in prior studies. A bibliographic search on multiple databases was conducted. Among the 2578 records identified, 209 were retrieved and assessed for eligibility, and 62 met the inclusion criteria (i.e., peer-reviewed primary research articles published in English in the last ten years with adolescent data). Results reveal a heterogeneous set of correlates with an imbalance favoring individual correlates. The most frequent PEBs in the reviewed studies were linked to energy and water conservation. The most frequent theoretical frameworks were the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Value–Belief–Norm Theory, while the most frequently highlighted research gap was the use of cross-sectional designs. These results can inform the targets of interventions aimed at increasing PEBs, which are fundamental aspects of the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development.

Keywords: sustainable behavior; pro-environmental behavior; psychosocial factors; sociocultural factors; adolescence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5383/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5383/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5383-:d:1421575

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().