Simulating the Sustainable Impact of Land Use Change on Carbon Emissions in the Upper Yellow River of Gannan: A Multi-Scenario Perspective Based on the PLUS Model

Yu-Chen Zhao, Yuan Tian, Qi-Peng Zhang (), Li-Yan Jiang and Qian Wang
Additional contact information
Yu-Chen Zhao: School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
Yuan Tian: School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
Qi-Peng Zhang: School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
Li-Yan Jiang: School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
Qian Wang: School of Geography and Environment, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 13, 1-17

Abstract: Changes to land use carbon emissions (LUCEs) have become significant contributors to increasingly severe climate issues. Land use change is one of the crucial factors that affect carbon emissions. Alpine meadows regions are sensitive to climate change and human activities. However, current research on LUCEs mainly focuses on analyzing present land use status and spatial patterns. To reveal and forecast future LUCEs in the alpine region, the Upper Yellow River of Gannan (UYRG) was used as a case study. Based on the land use data from 1990 to 2020, we used the multi-scenario PLUS model to predict the land use types in 2030 and analyzed the spatial and temporal dynamic trends of LUCEs from 1990 to 2030. The results showed a strong correlation between the predicted and actual land use types, with a Kappa value of 0.93, indicating the applicability of the PLUS model in predicting land use in the UYRG. Over the study period, construction land expanded, while woodland and grassland diminished. Carbon emissions (CEs) increased by 516.4% from −200,541.43 Mg CO 2 e in 1990 to 835,054.08 Mg CO 2 e in 2020, with construction land being the main contributor. In the Natural Development scenario for 2030, construction land expanded most rapidly, resulting in the highest LUCEs. In the Ecological Protection scenario, woodland and grassland expanded, while construction land decreased, leading to an expansion in carbon sinks. In the Cropland Protection scenario, cropland expanded, with CEs falling between the other two scenarios. These findings lay a theoretical groundwork for formulating policies addressing LUCEs in alpine meadows, providing valuable insights for further studies.

Keywords: land use carbon emissions; PLUS model; standard deviation ellipse; alpine meadow (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5481/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5481/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:13:p:5481-:d:1423866

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().