Socialscape Ecology: Integrating Social Features and Processes into Spatially Explicit Marine Conservation Planning

Merrill Baker-Médard (), Katherine Concannon, Courtney Gantt, Sierra Moen and Easton R. White
Additional contact information
Merrill Baker-Médard: Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA
Katherine Concannon: Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA
Courtney Gantt: Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA
Sierra Moen: Environmental Studies Program, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753, USA
Easton R. White: Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 14, 1-20

Abstract: Conservation planning is the process of locating, implementing, and maintaining areas that are managed to promote the persistence of biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human use. In this review, we analyze the ways in which social processes have been integrated into Marxan, a spatially explicit conservation planning tool used as one step in a broader process to select the location and size of protected areas. Drawing on 89 peer-reviewed articles published between 2005 and 2020, we analyzed the ways in which human activity, values, and processes are spatialized in the environment, something we call socialscape ecology. A socialscape ecology approach to conservation planning considers not only the spatial configuration of human activity in a land or seascape but also the underlying drivers of these activities, how resource use rights and access operate in an area, and how resource users contribute to data collection and decision making. Our results show that there has been a small but statistically significant increase in the total number of cost variables into Marxan analysis over time, with uneven performance across seven of the nine categories assessed. One notable area of improvement has been the increase over time in number of studies integrating socio-environmental change (e.g., climate change) in their analysis. Including accurate, context-specific, and detailed accounts of social features and processes within land and seascapes is essential for developing conservation plans that are cost-effective, ecologically sound, socially desirable, and just.

Keywords: marine conservation; Marxan; fisheries; marine protected area; conservation planning; spatial planning and design; trade-offs; human geography (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6078/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6078/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6078-:d:1436392

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().