EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to Choose Recycling Mode between Monopoly and Competition by Considering Blockchain Technology?

Xuemei Zhang, Haodong Zheng, Tao Hang and Qiang Meng ()
Additional contact information
Xuemei Zhang: Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
Haodong Zheng: Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
Tao Hang: Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China
Qiang Meng: Business School, Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 15, 1-29

Abstract: Enterprises adopting a circular economy approach can effectively solve the severe situation of resources and the environment, and recycling is considered an effective means to solve environmental issues. Simultaneously, blockchain technology (BT) has been used to enhance product quality trust. However, there is limited literature on how to choose between monopolistic and competitive recycling modes by considering BT. This paper uses a game involving a manufacturer, a retailer, and a third-party recycler (TPR) in a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The retailer can recycle on itself and compete with the TPR for recycling used products. The results show that BT adoption could increase the recycling rate and demand for remanufactured products. BT benefits the firms in the CLSC when they control usage costs, regardless of whether competitive recycling mode is used or not. In addition, whether BT is adopted or not, CLSC firms prefer competitive recycling mode only when the competitive intensity exceeds a specific threshold. Moreover, choosing an appropriate recycling mode can alleviate the negative impact of BT on the environment, then an all-win result can be obtained for CLSC firms, consumers, and society. These results can give suggestions for managers to optimize their supply chains regarding adopting BT and implementing recycling mode. In the future, we can expand our research on the transfer price of used products, the positive and negative effects of BT, and BT cost-sharing strategies.

Keywords: closed-loop supply chain; recycling mode; blockchain technology; competitive recycling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6296/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6296/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6296-:d:1441095

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-05
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6296-:d:1441095