Recognising Ecological Reflexivity: An Alternative Approach to Partnership Capabilities for Collaborative Governance

Joanna Stanberry (), David F. Murphy and Janis Bragan Balda
Additional contact information
Joanna Stanberry: Initiative for Leadership and Sustainability, Institute for Business, Industry, and Leadership, University of Cumbria, Ambleside LA22 9BB, UK
David F. Murphy: Initiative for Leadership and Sustainability, Institute for Business, Industry, and Leadership, University of Cumbria, Ambleside LA22 9BB, UK
Janis Bragan Balda: Robert C. Vackar College of Business and Entrepreneurship, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 16, 1-30

Abstract: Ecological reflexivity provides a key lever for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) but is underexplored in one prominent context: collaborative governance particularly associated with SDG 17. Using an exploratory study and novel approach to Q methodology, we investigate capabilities needed for advancing collaborative governance and cross-sector partnering through an exploratory study. Rather than treating these capacities as universal standards or aims for collaboration between varied stakeholders, they were offered as options that actors may value and choose to advance (or not). Local sustainability-focused actors in North West England sorted capabilities as statements, which discursively reframe multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) building blocks. The first analysis reveals three viewpoints that we name: The Convener, The Connector, and The Chair. The themes of communicative coordination, reflexivity, and power emerged in the three viewpoints, expressing distinct discourses. A separate, second analysis explores a viewpoint encompassing capabilities needed for ecological reflexivity. Our findings demonstrate possible barriers to some approaches valued in the MSP literature such as systems thinking. Finally, in our action research setting, it is possible that the methodology itself facilitated ecological reflexivity and offered entry points to enable agency in the context of SDG 17 and collaboration of diverse actors towards SDG implementation.

Keywords: sustainable development goals; multi-stakeholder partnerships; ecological reflexivity; Q methodology; action research; capabilities; collaborative governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6829/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6829/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6829-:d:1453046

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().