ESG Standards in China: Bibliometric Analysis, Development Status Research, and Future Research Directions

Lihua Zeng, Hao Li, Liyu Lin, Dora Juan Juan Hu and Hui Liu ()
Additional contact information
Lihua Zeng: Quality and Standards Academy, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
Hao Li: Quality and Standards Academy, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
Liyu Lin: College of New Materials and New Energies, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
Dora Juan Juan Hu: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
Hui Liu: Quality and Standards Academy, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 16, 1-24

Abstract: Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards have received widespread attention in the quest for sustainable development. However, a comprehensive understanding of the current status of ESG standards, particularly in the context of China, remains a scientific gap. This study bridges this gap by adopting a bibliometric analysis to comprehensively analyze the current status of ESG standards. Based on an analysis of 213 articles involving ESG standards in the Web of Science Core Collection database from 2015 to 2024, this study identified the global distribution of ESG standards organizations, research hotspots, trends, and cutting-edge status of ESG standards research. It was found that the research on ESG standards shows a growing trend: the research hotspots mainly focus on the areas of performance, rating, investment, and sustainability. Crucially, this study offers novel insights into the current development status of ESG standards in China, emphasizing the significant roles of the government’s promotion of ESG standard formulation and regulation, corporate voluntary compliance, and academic research and communication. Future research directions on ESG standards are proposed and imply that the implementation of ESG standards in China should be beneficial to sustainable development.

Keywords: ESG; ESG standards; CiteSpace; bibliometric analysis; ESG disclosure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7134/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7134/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7134-:d:1459819

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().