Morphometric Analysis and Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds Located in Heterogeneous Geographical Units—Case Study: The Buzău River Basin

Ioana Pastor, Danut Tanislav, Alexandru Nedelea (), Daniel Dunea, Gheorghe Serban (), Ali Torabi Haghighi, Daniel Sabau and Petre Bretcan
Additional contact information
Ioana Pastor: Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviște, 130004 Targoviște, Romania
Danut Tanislav: Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviște, 130004 Targoviște, Romania
Alexandru Nedelea: Department of Geomorphology—Pedology—Geomatics, Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, St. Nicolae Bălcescu, No. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania
Daniel Dunea: Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Food Science, Valahia University of Targoviște, 13, Aleea Sinaia, 130004 Targoviște, Romania
Gheorghe Serban: Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, 5–7 Clinicilor, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Ali Torabi Haghighi: Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
Daniel Sabau: Faculty of Geography, Babeș-Bolyai University, 5–7 Clinicilor, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Petre Bretcan: Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Valahia University of Targoviște, 130004 Targoviște, Romania

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-24

Abstract: The present study evaluates selected morphometric characteristics of 39 direct tributaries of the Buzău River (area of 4112 km 2 ) to prioritize development actions in these sub-watersheds, which are distributed in three geographical regions within the full Buzău River watershed: the Carpathian, Subcarpathian, and plains regions. By combining a variable number of morphometric parameters, using various mathematical models, we can evaluate the state of balance or imbalance in a watershed and identify sub-watersheds vulnerable to natural processes. Prioritization was achieved using composite (Cp) values by comparing two scenarios. In the first scenario, 11 derived morphometric parameters were used, and in the second scenario, another 7 parameters were added. The obtained values were grouped into five classes (very high, high, medium, low, and very low). Due to the heterogeneity of relief units among geographical regions, there are classification differences for sub-watersheds among those regions. Watersheds classed as very high priority for intervention actions are located in the Carpathian (SW1, SW2, SW15, SW16) and Subcarpathian areas (SW24, SW30), which are characterized by high relief energy and pronounced slope instability, which leads to an increase in the risk of flooding and land degradation. For comparison, all sub-watersheds in the plains region, are classified as very low or low priority. Since the arithmetic mean is sensitive to extreme values, its use in the calculation of composite (Cp) values causes the values to be “eclipsed” and the sub-watersheds to be placed in different prioritization classes (SW18 and SW34), depending on the analyzed scenario, due to the large number of parameters and classified sub-watersheds.

Keywords: sub-watershed; prioritization; morphometric analyses; GIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7567/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7567/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7567-:d:1468953

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().