EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a Composite Bamboo Shear Wall System Developed for El Salvador

Louisa Young (), Sebastian Kaminski (), Mike Kovacs and Edwin Zea Escamilla
Additional contact information
Louisa Young: Arup, 8 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BJ, UK
Sebastian Kaminski: Arup, 8 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BJ, UK
Mike Kovacs: Arup, 8 Fitzroy Street, London W1T 4BJ, UK
Edwin Zea Escamilla: HIL F 28.2, Institut für Bau- und Infrastrukturmanagement, Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-24

Abstract: To meet the UN sustainable development goal targets by 2030, it is necessary to provide adequate, resilient, and affordable housing solutions which are also low-carbon. In the context of affordable housing in El Salvador, an improved vernacular construction system, following the composite bamboo shear wall (CBSW) technology, has been developed as a feasible option to fill the current housing deficit. A life cycle assessment (LCA) has been conducted comparing a house built using the CBSW system with a reinforced concrete hollow block masonry system, considering the A1 to A5 (raw material production and manufacture) and B4 (replacement) life cycle modules. The LCA scope was limited to modules where there was sufficient confidence in the inputs. End-of-life modules were excluded as there is a large degree of uncertainty in the end-of-life scenarios for these materials in the regional context. The LCA results show that the CBSW system has approximately 64% of the global warming potential (GWP) of the reinforced masonry house, and when considering biogenic carbon, this reduces to 53%. There is additional potential to minimise impacts and maximise end-of-life opportunities (e.g., re-use, biofuel, etc.) for the biomaterials within the CBSW system, if considering modules beyond the scope of this paper, and this needs further study. Nevertheless, the results from this LCA—of limited A1 to A5 and B4 scope—show that the CBSW system has significant sustainability advantages over conventional construction systems and is considered a promising solution to alleviate the housing deficit in El Salvador.

Keywords: sustainability assessment; life cycle assessment (LCA); affordable housing; bamboo; biomaterials; tropics; El Salvador (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7602/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7602/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7602-:d:1469909

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7602-:d:1469909