EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing Produce Growers’ Perceptions and Adoption of Agricultural Water Safety Practices in the United States

Dharmendra Kalauni (), Laura A. Warner (), Matt Benge and Michelle D. Danyluk
Additional contact information
Dharmendra Kalauni: Department of Agricultural Education & Communication, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110540, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Laura A. Warner: Department of Agricultural Education & Communication, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110540, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Matt Benge: Department of Agricultural Education & Communication, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110540, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Michelle D. Danyluk: UF/IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Rd., Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 17, 1-27

Abstract: The Produce Rule regulates food safety among produce growers in the United States. Policy exemptions (e.g., for farms with average produce sales under USD 30,000 over three years) pose a threat to local food safety, particularly given exempt growers’ role in fresh produce production. Understanding exempt growers’ perceptions of food safety practices and the factors influencing their voluntary adoption is crucial. A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted to assess growers’ current engagement, their perceptions of agricultural water safety practices, and their influence on adoption decisions. The findings indicate inadequate engagement with agricultural water safety practices, with production water-related safety practices showing higher engagement compared to post-harvest water practices. Overall, growers reported favorable perceptions toward agricultural water safety practices. The perceived compatibility, relative advantage, and observability predicted adoption decisions among exempt growers, with the perceived compatibility being the strongest predictor. Policymakers and education professionals should design strategies and tailored educational interventions and messaging for exempt growers to emphasize the compatibility, relative advantage, and observability of agricultural water safety practices. Furthermore, it is recommended to explore policies and other mechanisms to increase the perceived relative advantage (immediacy of rewards and direct benefits) for exempt growers to promote voluntary adoption of these on-farm food safety practices.

Keywords: production water; post-harvest water; small-scale growers; safety; produce; voluntary compliance; produce rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7635/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7635/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7635-:d:1470318

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7635-:d:1470318