Hydrochemical Evolution and Nitrate Source Identification of River Water and Groundwater in Huashan Watershed, China

Xue Li, Jin Lin (), Lu Zhang (), Jiangbo Han, Yunfeng Dai, Xing Min and Huirong Wang
Additional contact information
Xue Li: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Jin Lin: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Lu Zhang: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Jiangbo Han: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Yunfeng Dai: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Xing Min: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China
Huirong Wang: Hydrology and Water Resources Department, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-16

Abstract: The combined hydrochemical analysis, factor analysis, and isotopic signals of water and nitrate were applied to explore the hydrochemical origin and identify the sources and transformation of nitrate in river water and groundwater in the Huashan watershed. Additionally, a Bayesian isotope mixing model (SIAR) was employed for quantitative assessment of the nitrate sources. The results indicated that both river water and groundwater were dominated by HCO 3 -Ca and HCO 3 -Ca·Mg types; both originated from precipitation and were influenced by evaporation. The main constituent ions in the river water and groundwater primarily originated from carbonate and silicate dissolution, with the presence of cation exchange in the groundwater. The water chemistry of river water was greatly influenced by physicochemical factors, while that of groundwater was mainly controlled by water–rock interaction. NO 3 − in river water was mainly influenced by soil nitrogen (SN) and manure and septic wastes (MSWs), while NO 3 − in groundwater was jointly affected by ammonium fertilizers (AF), SN, and MSWs. With the exception of denitrification observed in the groundwater at the watershed outlet, denitrification was absent in both groundwater in the piedmont area and in river water. The SIAR model results demonstrated that the contribution rates of atmospheric precipitation (AP), AF, SN, and MSWs to river water were 12%, 21%, 25%, and 42%, respectively, while to groundwater, they were 16%, 27%, 10%, and 47%, respectively. Overall, MSWs were the main sources of nitrate in the river water and groundwater. It is necessary to prevent the leakage of MSWs when managing water resources.

Keywords: Huashan watershed; hydrochemical evolution; SIAR model; nitrate source identification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/423/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/423/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:423-:d:1312624

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().