Unraveling the Knowledge Roadmap of Building Policy Mixes: A Scientometric Analysis

Zhuo Xu, Xiaohu Li, Lie Ma, Yuehong Lu and Guo Liu ()
Additional contact information
Zhuo Xu: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
Xiaohu Li: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
Lie Ma: PowerChina Chongqing Investment Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401121, China
Yuehong Lu: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China
Guo Liu: School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243032, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-23

Abstract: Improving energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions from buildings are crucial for achieving sustainable development. To realize these goals, it is essential to adopt a policy mix. However, despite much effort in this field, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding on building policy mixes (BPMs), which challenges building sustainability. To address this research gap, this study attempted to uncover the knowledge landscape of BPM through scientometric analysis. By employing methods such as keywords co-occurrence analysis, clustering analysis, co-citation analysis, and research trend analysis, this study systematically examined the current status, hot topics, underlying knowledge framework, knowledge domains, and frontiers of BPM research. The findings revealed that the existing BPM research primarily focuses on various aspects, including policy-related topics such as building energy efficiency policies and policy instruments, as well as topics like green affordable housing, hindering factors, carbon pricing, use obligation, construction waste reduction, and sustainable construction methods. Furthermore, the analysis identified research frontiers in BPM, encompassing policy considerations (e.g., building efficiency policy, split incentive, carbon tax, and carbon pricing), energy-related aspects (e.g., consumption, green transition), political dimensions (e.g., governance, management), building-related factors (e.g., green building, retrofitting), the innovation system, and the evolutionary game. Based on these findings, this study suggests that future research in BPM can deepen insight into interdisciplinary policy mixes by focusing on policy strategies, processes, and features. This study contributes to a holistic understanding of BPM and offers insightful guidance for both researchers and practitioners seeking to advance sustainable practices in the building sector.

Keywords: policy mix; building; knowledge roadmap; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/428/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/428/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:428-:d:1312708

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().