Comparative Analysis of Carbon Footprints from Away and Home Matches: A Study on Leading Basketball and Football Teams in Türkiye

Arif Cetin (), Aydın Pekel, Cemal Ozman, Beyhan Ozgur and Ayse Demir
Additional contact information
Arif Cetin: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Marmara University, 34815 Istanbul, Türkiye
Aydın Pekel: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Marmara University, 34815 Istanbul, Türkiye
Cemal Ozman: Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bartin University, 74100 Bartın, Türkiye
Beyhan Ozgur: School of Physical Education and Sports, Mardin Artuklu University, 47100 Mardin, Türkiye
Ayse Demir: School of Physical Education and Sports, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakır, Türkiye

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 21, 1-14

Abstract: Problem: Basketball and football teams in Türkiye have the capacity to travel hundreds of kilometres for league matches. In general, such major leagues and leading teams travelling from Türkiye have not been sufficiently researched in the context of Türkiye’s leading leagues and teams. In this context, the aim of this study is to assess and compare the carbon footprint of the transport activities of basketball and football teams in Türkiye for their home and away matches for the 2023–2024 season. Methods: The research is based on EN 16258 and ICAO carbon emissions methodologies. This study aims to calculate and compare the carbon footprint of different transport methods, including bus and plane, used by five basketball and football teams in Türkiye. Results: The findings show that there are significant differences between the teams in terms of travelling distances and carbon footprints. Trabzonspor from the Black Sea region released the highest CO 2 emissions from air travel with a total of 91,667.1 kgCO 2e , while Fenerbahçe Beko had the lowest CO 2 emissions with 5316.72 kgCO 2e . In terms of bus travel, Gaziantep FK led the CO 2 emissions with 4356.45 kgCO 2e , while Türk Telekom was the team with the lowest CO 2 emissions with 1233.225 kgCO 2e . The findings also reveal a notable difference in the number of trees teams need to plant to offset their carbon emissions. Because of their travel patterns, Antalyaspor would need to plant 3481 trees, whereas Fenerbahçe Beko would only need to plant 348 trees. Conclusions: Air travel is emerging as the dominant source of CO 2 emissions and has a greater impact on the environmental impact of teams that rely heavily on airplanes. In this study, the league structure and duration play a critical role in shaping the carbon footprint of sports teams. The football season, which is longer compared to basketball, requires more frequent travel, especially for teams in more remote regions, resulting in higher carbon emissions than basketball. The dominance of Marmara region teams in basketball has a negative impact on the carbon footprint since these teams generally have shorter travel distances.

Keywords: carbon footprint; sustainability; travel emission; basketball; football (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9269/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9269/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9269-:d:1506498

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().