Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives

Xuanyi Qu () and Xuyuan Chen
Additional contact information
Xuanyi Qu: Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, No. 5268, Renmin Street, Changchun 130024, China
Xuyuan Chen: Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, No. 5268, Renmin Street, Changchun 130024, China

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 22, 1-25

Abstract: Textbook research has long been a critical area within the educational academic community. With the ongoing spread of globalization, the significance of educational globalization has become increasingly apparent. Comparative analyses of textbooks from different countries have thus emerged as a popular and critical research topic. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in cross-cultural textbook studies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of global disparities in this field. This study compiles essential findings from both domestic and international textbook research, aiming to uncover differences and trends. Using CiteSpace software (V.6.2.R4), a comprehensive visual analysis was conducted through bibliometric and knowledge graph methods, comparing Chinese and international textbook research over the past decade (2013–2023). This paper presents an intuitive visual map of the key dynamics in textbook research. Utilizing a quantitative approach, this study analyzed 1644 and 1478 relevant articles from the Web of Science (WoS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, respectively. It examined the annual distribution, core contributors, and institutional co-occurrence of textbook research from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023, identifying the distinctive characteristics of textbook research both in China and internationally. Additionally, CiteSpace’s built-in algorithm was used to extract keywords and highlight primary research areas, while keyword burst detection was utilized to illustrate developmental trends. The analysis revealed key differences between Chinese and international textbook research in terms of research focus, organizational forms, focal areas, and future development trends. This study also discusses potential future directions in this area, such as establishing a systematic framework for textbook research, fostering a global community of textbook scholars, and integrating localized elements into textbook research. Additionally, it highlights the importance of sustainability in textbook research, emphasizing the need for educational materials that support long-term global educational goals.

Keywords: textbook research; CiteSpace; bibliometric analysis; comparative education; educational sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9731/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9731/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9731-:d:1516589

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().