Perennial Forage Systems Enhance Ecosystem Quality Variables Compared with Annual Forage Systems

Ogechukwu Igboke, Elisandra S. O. Bortolon, Amanda J. Ashworth, Joel Tallaksen, Valentin D. Picasso and Marisol T. Berti ()
Additional contact information
Ogechukwu Igboke: Department of Plant Sciences, Loftsgard Hall, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
Elisandra S. O. Bortolon: Department of Plant Sciences, Loftsgard Hall, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
Amanda J. Ashworth: Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
Joel Tallaksen: West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267, USA
Valentin D. Picasso: Department of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Marisol T. Berti: Department of Plant Sciences, Loftsgard Hall, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-17

Abstract: There is an intense argument about the environmental impact of annual vs. perennial forage production systems. In this study, a systematic review was employed to obtain 47 empirical studies from 13 published papers between the years 2017–2023 to help clarify the issue. The objective of this study was to determine how perennial and annual forage (business-as-usual, BAU) production systems affect dry matter yield (DM) and energy of production including specific environmental impact variables. Impact variables were classified into three main groups: human health, ecosystem quality, and resource consumption. Net energy of lactation (NEL) was considered as a functional unit. Overall, perennial forage production systems varied less in DM yield and energy production than annual monocrop systems, indicating stability in perennial production. There was no statistically significant difference in human health and resource consumption variables between perennial and annual forage production systems, except for ozone layer depletion potential. However, perennial forage systems significantly lowered variables within the ecosystem quality category. Ecotoxicity potential decreased by two and 18 times compared with BAU—control (only annual monoculture forages), and BAU—improved (any annual cropping system other than BAU—control), respectively. Perennial forage systems showed a significant effect size of −8.16, which was slightly less than the effect size of the BAU—improved system but two times less than BAU—control in terms of terrestrial acidification potential. While BAU—control showed an insignificant effect size in relation to eutrophication potential (EUP), perennial forage systems reduced EUP by approximately five and two times compared with BAU—control and BAU—improved, respectively. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of promoting perennial forage production system to foster resilience and stability in DM yield and energy production, with improvements in environmental human health (ozone layer depletion potential) and ecosystem quality variables.

Keywords: diversification; cropping systems; forages; perenniality; business as usual; heterogeneity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10160/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10160/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10160-:d:1525742

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().