True Cost Accounting Using Life Cycle Assessment Methods and Data: A Case Study Comparing Palm, Rapeseed, and Coconut Oils for Sustainability and Nutrition
Mauricio R. Bellon (),
Nicholas Benard,
Maricarmen Vizcaino,
Kathleen Merrigan and
Christopher Wharton
Additional contact information
Mauricio R. Bellon: Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University, Walton Center for Planetary Health, 777 East University Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Nicholas Benard: Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University, Walton Center for Planetary Health, 777 East University Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Maricarmen Vizcaino: Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University, Walton Center for Planetary Health, 777 East University Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Kathleen Merrigan: Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University, Walton Center for Planetary Health, 777 East University Dr, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Christopher Wharton: College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, 7231 E Sonoran Arroyo Mall, Mesa, AZ 85212, USA
Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 23, 1-21
Abstract:
True Cost Accounting (TCA) aims to assess positive and negative externalities in agri-food value chains by focusing on four capitals: produced, natural, human, and social. While produced capital is easily measured through market values, obtaining relevant data for measuring natural, human, and social capitals can be challenging. To address this challenge, this paper presents a case study around the production in Asia of three globally important edible plant oils: palm, rapeseed, and coconut. Results show that readily available methods and data from different types of Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) can be integrated into the framework of TCA to quantify and monetize positive and negative externalities associated with the production and consumption of these oils and to analyze the tradeoffs involved in choosing among them. However, the use of LCA methods and data also entails significant assumptions and limitations that must be considered when evaluating their use in TCA. Specific results show that the environmental impacts of production are small in comparison to the potential nutritional health benefits of consuming one oil over another. This study provides a roadmap for conducting similar analyses, allowing for a greater understanding of often overlooked sustainability and nutritional issues of food items.
Keywords: externalities; sustainable agri-food value chains; tradeoffs; decision making; true cost accounting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10366/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10366/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10366-:d:1530559
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().