Agri-Food Policies and Family Farms’ Commercialization: Insights from Brazil

Valdemar João Wesz Junior, Simone Piras (), Catia Grisa and Stefano Ghinoi
Additional contact information
Valdemar João Wesz Junior: Latin American Institute of Economy, Society and Politics, Federal University of Latin American Integration, Rua Aluísio Souza, n. 765-Residencial Araras, Casa 101-Jardim Florença, Foz do Iguaçu 85867-295, PR, Brazil
Simone Piras: Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Department, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK
Catia Grisa: Litoral Norte Campus, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Dona Adda Mascarenhas 741, Ap. 404, Jardim Planalto, Porto Alegre 91220-240, RS, Brazil

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 24, 1-21

Abstract: Brazil is one of the main agricultural producers in the world, and its agri-food system has been experiencing concentration and intensification. Since the beginning of the 1990s, the Brazilian government has implemented different interventions to support family agriculture, such as the National Programme for Strengthening Family Farming (PRONAF), the Technical Assistance and Rural Extension Programme (ATER), and different seed distribution programs. Despite the social and economic relevance of these programs, there is a lack of quantitative studies investigating their impact on the resilience of family farms, primarily the promotion of commercialization. We aim to fill this gap by applying propensity score matching techniques to household-level data from the 2014 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey. Only this survey has recorded this type of information to date. We compare the commercialization behavior of policy recipients with that of non-recipients, accounting for interaction effects between different policies. Our results show that PRONAF has had a significant positive impact on family farmers’ propensity to engage in commercialization, and the effect increases if they also have access to technical assistance. Technical assistance alone has a positive effect, while seed distribution appears not to make a significant difference. Our results suggest that an appropriate policy mix can increase the resilience of family farms in emerging countries.

Keywords: family agriculture; market integration; policy mix; impact analysis; propensity score matching (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11102/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11102/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11102-:d:1546666

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().