The Potential of Co-Designing with Living Organisms: Towards a New Ecological Paradigm in Architecture

Natasha Chayaamor-Heil (), Thibaut Houette, Özge Demirci and Lidia Badarnah
Additional contact information
Natasha Chayaamor-Heil: UMR MAP MAACC 3495 CNRS/MC, 23-27 Rue des Ardennes, 75019 Paris, France
Thibaut Houette: Department of Biology, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
Özge Demirci: Department of Architecture, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
Lidia Badarnah: Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, Faculty of Environment and Technology, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 2, 1-36

Abstract: Living organisms have been progressively used by designers to propose alternative design outcomes aiming towards more ecological aspects. The design development and manufacturing of new materials or design components from living organisms are more achievable in textile, fashion, or product design than in architecture and construction due to the scale, multi-layer constraints, and requirements. The aim of this paper is to investigate the interdisciplinary framework, the opportunities, and limitations of introducing living organisms into the design process, including the implementation from the design ideas to prototyping until commercialization. In this paper, we focus on three types of living organisms: algae, bacteria, and fungi . Firstly, we overviewed and studied existing projects and experimentations to understand the design process and fabrication of living organisms in other domains in comparison to architecture. Secondly, we selected three case studies in architecture for each organism to analyze. We collected the data and conducted interviews with multidisciplinary experts involved in each case. Our findings show a better understanding of the potential to integrate living organisms in architectural design, the advantages, and the difficulties towards ecological awareness. The results from the interview and a comparative analysis show the advantages and constraints of each case. The future outlooks towards the use of living organisms as part of design in architecture are also discussed.

Keywords: algae; bacteria; mycelium; living materials; building construction; biofabrication; large-scale production; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/673/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/2/673/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:673-:d:1317836

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().