Green versus Grey Framing: Exploring the Mechanism behind the Negative Footprint Illusion in Environmental Sustainability Assessments

Karen Gorissen (), Bert Weijters and Berre Deltomme
Additional contact information
Karen Gorissen: School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Bert Weijters: Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Berre Deltomme: Faculty of Psychology & Educational Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium

Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, issue 4, 1-10

Abstract: Given the complexity of assessing the environmental sustainability of products, consumers rely on cognitive strategies to simplify complex information and develop quick judgments, often referred to as heuristics, when processing eco-information. One of these heuristics is called ‘the Negative Footprint Illusion’: Consumers erroneously estimate the total environmental impact of a combination of a green and non-green product as lower than the same non-green product alone. In this research, we test this bias and explore its underlying mechanism. We evoke a more summative vs. more evaluative mindset by framing the response scales negatively (in terms of environmental damage, referred to as ‘grey scaling’) vs. positively (in terms of environmental friendliness, referred to as ‘green scaling’). This is carried out by using an online between-subject experiment in which respondents either respond on an evaluative response scale (green scaling), or a summative response scale (grey scaling). A hamburger and bio-apple were used as stimuli (either shown together or apart). First, the results show that the negative footprint is only apparent in the green scaling condition. Second, respondents who score higher on environmental concern show a stronger negative footprint illusion for the green scaling condition. Our study not only elucidates the cognitive mechanisms driving the negative footprint illusion but also offers strategic directions for both theoretical advancement and practical applications in environmental decision-making, highlighting effective ways to mitigate this bias.

Keywords: negative footprint illusion; averaging bias; response scale formats; positive vs. negative framing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1411/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1411/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1411-:d:1335260

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().